Liverpool’s €60 million transfer bid has been rejected by Real Madrid.

Real Madrid appear to be on the verge of signing Borussia Dortmund midfielder Jude Bellingham for around €120 million

It has the potential to be a watershed moment for Los Blancos. At only 19 years old, the Englishman is a special talent who recently won the Bundesliga Player of the Season award.

He has the potential to be a Real Madrid mainstay in the middle of the park for many years to come. And, if things go as planned, it would not be surprising to see him on the Ballon d’Or podium someday.

Real Madrid is developing a strong core of young midfielders. Eduardo Camavinga, Fede Valverde, and Aurelien Tchouameni are already on the team.

However, there have been some concerns raised about Tchouameni’s future. He was signed from AS Monaco last summer and has had a promising start to his Real Madrid career. His form dipped after the World Cup, and he appeared to fall down the pecking order towards the end of the season.

Liverpool’s €60 million transfer bid has been rejected by Real Madrid.
Tchouameni’s underwhelming form, however, has not dampened interest in his signature. Liverpool were also interested in him last summer and appear to be looking to sign him if an opportunity arises.

Liverpool were interested in signing Tchouameni, according to Defensa Central (via The Hard Tackle), but their €60 million transfer bid was rejected by Real Madrid.

Tchouameni appears to be an important part of Real Madrid’s future plans. One can only hope that he will be able to play his way back into the starting lineup soon. Of course, the arrival of Bellingham could make that more difficult, as he is expected to enter the starting XI right away.

Liverpool’s loss to Tottenham was entangled in discussion after Luis Diaz had an objective erroneously precluded for offside, and presently Sky Sports have given new proof on the occurrence

Sky Sports have uncovered that the authorities on the pitch during Liverpool’s dubious 2-1 loss to Tottenham just realized they’d committed an error refusing Luis Diaz’s objective at half-time, while the botching VAR administrators knew essentially straight away..

A miscommunication between ref Simon Hooper and VAR Darren Britain saw Diaz’s objective chalked off on Saturday, regardless of the Reds winger being onside prior to crushing the ball past Tottenham goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario. That is on the grounds that Britain in the VAR center point at Stockley Park was mostly certain, possibly by mistake, that the on-field choice was to give an objective.

Whenever he’d defined a 2D boundary to guarantee that Diaz was onside, he told Hooper “check total” and the game proceeded – yet at the same time at 0-0. Britain and partner Dan Cook felt that it wasn’t in the VAR convention to stop the game by and by after it’d restarted and subsequently the on-field authorities didn’t know about their mistake until the span.

Liverpool have proactively reached the PGMOL requesting to approach the sound of Hooper and Britain’s discussion, however Reds legend Jamie Carragher is as yet irate about the “horrible slip-up.” Carragher proclaimed on Monday Night Football: ” I don’t think the inclination about VAR has been lower, it’s at emergency point.

“It’s not only this choice it’s on the rear of different episodes this season, similar to the Wolves one with Manchester Joined together. I would rather not heap into the authorities or [PGMOL chief] Howard Webb, they should feel horrendous. I’m not into the paranoid fears – nobody acquires anything from this. We’ve every single committed error. In any case, this is an unpleasant misstep, phenomenal, you can’t exactly accept the clarification that has been given.”

Liverpool gave an assertion on Sunday night communicating their rage at the episode, notwithstanding the PGMOL recognizing that there was a “importance human blunder” in the span of an hour of full-time. ” We completely acknowledge the tensions that match authorities work under yet these tensions should be reduced, not exacerbated, by the presence and execution of VAR,” they said.

“It is accordingly inadmissible that adequate time was not stood to permit the right choice to be made and that there was no ensuing intercession. That such shortfalls have previously been sorted as “huge human mistake” is additionally unsatisfactory. All possible results ought to be laid out exclusively by the audit and with full straightforwardness.

Other News 

Jacqui Oatley shares what VAR told the referee following the offside call in Tottenham vs. Liverpool

Tottenham news – The discussion between Simon Hooper and VAR Darren Britain from Luis Diaz’s offside objective in Prods versus Liverpool hopes to have been uncovered

Head Association reporter Jacqui Oatley has uncovered what might have been told Simon Hooper by VAR during the audit of Luis Diaz’s offside objective. The Chief Association conflict among Tottenham and Liverpool was immersed in VAR debate with two red cards and a somewhat late champ filling the game with show.

The game’s unequivocal second shown up profound into added time when Pedro Porro’s wild cross was scraped into his own net by Joel Matip however the really two arguments in the game occurred in the principal half. Not long before the half hour mark, Curtis Jones was shown a straight red card for a test on Yves Bissouma, after a VAR intercession.

After eight minutes, Diaz thought he had given 10-man Liverpool the lead, just for the objective to be chalked off in light of the fact that the forward was considered offside. A fast VAR check occurred however it has since become known that Darren Britain, the authority at Stockley Park, had committed a horrible error with how he might interpret the occurrence being that the on-pitch choice was objective given.

With insignificant straightforwardness in plain view to both match-going fans and watchers at home in regards to VAR, Jacqui Oatley has endeavored to give some lucidity on what happens when occurrences are surveyed by VAR according to the viewpoint of a reporter.

Posting on X (previously Twitter), she composed: ” Liverpool VAR: We Chief Association reporters have the VAR feed in our ears so when he says “check total” (they do this definitely a bigger number of times than watchers acknowledge as they check many difficulties for conceivable *red card emoji*, it would’ve seemed OK here to add “the objective stands essentially. ” No 7 Onside”.

Like that, it would’ve quickly become obvious that he’d misconstrued the on-field choice (ie offside called) and this error couldn’t have ever occurred.” Hence, it appears to be the explanation the blunder was spotted was down to the absence of correspondence between the authorities over what was the first choice and what precisely was being evaluated.

Because of this data becoming exposed, Liverpool put out a dooming announcement to the PGMOL on their complaints with the choice. A proper solicitation has likewise since been made by Liverpool to hear the sound from the VAR space to uncover precisely exact thing prompted the Diaz objective being unfairly prohibited.