Philippe Clement, the manager of Rangers, has come under fire from Bill Leckie for remarks he made regarding the officiating following the Celtic final loss.
According to the Scottish Sun writer, Patrick Stewart, the Belgian, and Fraser Thornton, the recently appointed chairman, should fight for the sake of the game rather than for personal gain.
However, the SFA’s admission that VAR made a mistake at Hampden Park on December 15th gave the Gers some measure of redemption.
On December 22, Leckie wrote: “Pity poor Philippe Clement, who has been permanently damaged by those savage rodents in the SFA’s video vault.
They will need to be more than that, though, if Clement, new chairman Fraser Thornton, and CEO Patrick Stewart are any indication.
They must understand the power they could have if they decide to fight for the sake of the game rather than for retribution.
The same is true of their opponents around the city, who, according to history, would have been making it just as much about themselves if they had not received the same punishment.
What about Clement? I would love to sit down with him and tell him that the rest of us never, ever make decisions that are in opposition to his lot or Celtic.
“Then he would understand the sensation of actual scars.”
Philippe Clement, the Rangers manager, is in the right to create a stir.
Many people believe that Scottish football refereeing judgments are consistently subpar, which is why Clement made these remarks.
They draw attention to a larger problem in the sport, where crucial games can be affected by referee mistakes, particularly since VAR was introduced.
Clement’s position goes beyond only seeking revenge; it also promotes higher refereeing standards, which are essential to maintaining the fairness of the game.
The SFA might be under pressure to adopt stricter training, more precise rules, and improved technology use if all managers, regardless of club affiliation, publicly questioned and demanded improvements in officiating.
The management’s combined effort may result in structural adjustments that lessen the occurrence of contentious rulings and raise the legitimacy of games.
Clubs don’t want to apologize after the game because it won’t accomplish anything.
Leave a Reply