Tim Sherwood claims he was dangerously underestimating the £75 million Liverpool player.

Virgil van Dijk has to be regarded as one of Liverpool’s greatest acquisitions ever

The Dutch defender has proven to be a steal for the Reds, even at £75 million, when they could have acquired him for far less money a few years ago.

In fact, Van Dijk made his name at Southampton for just £12 million before becoming a star at Liverpool.

On the No Tippy Tappy Football Podcast, Tim Sherwood discussed how he vastly underrated Van Dijk when he moved to St. Mary’s. In hindsight, the top clubs must be cursing themselves for not signing him when they had the chance.

Sherwood claims that he took a close look at the defender, but because he was playing in the Scottish League and everything appeared to be going smoothly for him, he doubted his ability.

Sherwood said that he underestimated Van Dijk. The former manager of Tottenham and Aston Villa said that he underestimated the Liverpool star.

“We all looked at Southampton, and we all discredited the Scottish league. They were the team. He was a center back who played and never headed the ball. He just played and found it too easy. They took the risk and paid Liverpool a lot, so credit goes to Southampton.

Even now, Van Dijk isn’t the only football player who has been underrated because they play in Scotland.

In fact, this continues to occur today. Due to his past, Ange Postecoglou, who joined Tottenham from Celtic this summer, was almost immediately dismissed.

Postecoglou, on the other hand, quickly dispelled his doubters, just like Van Dijk did.

It’s easy to criticize the Scottish League because of the perceived low standard, but there are occasionally some gems north of the border.

Liverpool’s loss to Tottenham was entangled in discussion after Luis Diaz had an objective erroneously precluded for offside, and presently Sky Sports have given new proof on the occurrence

Sky Sports have uncovered that the authorities on the pitch during Liverpool’s dubious 2-1 loss to Tottenham just realized they’d committed an error refusing Luis Diaz’s objective at half-time, while the botching VAR administrators knew essentially straight away..

A miscommunication between ref Simon Hooper and VAR Darren Britain saw Diaz’s objective chalked off on Saturday, regardless of the Reds winger being onside prior to crushing the ball past Tottenham goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario. That is on the grounds that Britain in the VAR center point at Stockley Park was mostly certain, possibly by mistake, that the on-field choice was to give an objective.

Whenever he’d defined a 2D boundary to guarantee that Diaz was onside, he told Hooper “check total” and the game proceeded – yet at the same time at 0-0. Britain and partner Dan Cook felt that it wasn’t in the VAR convention to stop the game by and by after it’d restarted and subsequently the on-field authorities didn’t know about their mistake until the span.

Liverpool have proactively reached the PGMOL requesting to approach the sound of Hooper and Britain’s discussion, however Reds legend Jamie Carragher is as yet irate about the “horrible slip-up.” Carragher proclaimed on Monday Night Football: ” I don’t think the inclination about VAR has been lower, it’s at emergency point.

“It’s not only this choice it’s on the rear of different episodes this season, similar to the Wolves one with Manchester Joined together. I would rather not heap into the authorities or [PGMOL chief] Howard Webb, they should feel horrendous. I’m not into the paranoid fears – nobody acquires anything from this. We’ve every single committed error. In any case, this is an unpleasant misstep, phenomenal, you can’t exactly accept the clarification that has been given.”

Liverpool gave an assertion on Sunday night communicating their rage at the episode, notwithstanding the PGMOL recognizing that there was a “importance human blunder” in the span of an hour of full-time. ” We completely acknowledge the tensions that match authorities work under yet these tensions should be reduced, not exacerbated, by the presence and execution of VAR,” they said.

“It is accordingly inadmissible that adequate time was not stood to permit the right choice to be made and that there was no ensuing intercession. That such shortfalls have previously been sorted as “huge human mistake” is additionally unsatisfactory. All possible results ought to be laid out exclusively by the audit and with full straightforwardness.