‘He hasn’t been good,’ admits Jose Enrique of Liverpool’s 20-year-old midfielder yesterday night.

On Thursday, Jarrell Quansah’s performance for Liverpool was widely praised

In the Europa League, the defender scored his first goal for Liverpool, and as you can imagine, that goal received most of the attention.

On the other hand, Jose Enrique stated on his YouTube channel that Quansah shouldn’t necessarily be too proud of his performance in the middle of the week.

Indeed, Enrique asserted that this was the first time he had seen the defender play live, and he was not impressed, and that he found the defender to be actually not very good defensively in the Europa League.

Enrique was unimpressed when the pundit said what he thought of the defender.

“However, he’s not been playing great today. He has obviously received a lot of praise, but I still don’t always agree with everything. This is the first game I’ve watched him in person; the day before, I watched the games on Wyscout because I was busy. However, this is the first game I’ve watched him in person, and I need to see him more to get a full picture of him. Fair play to him for scoring the goal, but he hasn’t been very good defensively, in my opinion,” Enrique stated.

It must be stated that dead rubber Quansah was not performing at his best on Thursday, but the entire Liverpool team was not performing at its best.

The Reds went into this game knowing that it would be a dead rubber because they were already aware that they were out of the group.

In this one, Quansah and any other player can’t be blamed for taking their foot off the gas.

The 20-year-old has, all around, been generally excellent for Liverpool this season, and keeping in mind that he in all actuality does in any case have a lot to demonstrate, he looks a thrilling possibility and he’s positively moving in the correct bearing with regards to his turn of events.

Quansah’s performance this week was not his best, but his goal should still give him enough confidence to continue.

Liverpool’s loss to Tottenham was entangled in discussion after Luis Diaz had an objective erroneously precluded for offside, and presently Sky Sports have given new proof on the occurrence

Sky Sports have uncovered that the authorities on the pitch during Liverpool’s dubious 2-1 loss to Tottenham just realized they’d committed an error refusing Luis Diaz’s objective at half-time, while the botching VAR administrators knew essentially straight away..

A miscommunication between ref Simon Hooper and VAR Darren Britain saw Diaz’s objective chalked off on Saturday, regardless of the Reds winger being onside prior to crushing the ball past Tottenham goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario. That is on the grounds that Britain in the VAR center point at Stockley Park was mostly certain, possibly by mistake, that the on-field choice was to give an objective.

Whenever he’d defined a 2D boundary to guarantee that Diaz was onside, he told Hooper “check total” and the game proceeded – yet at the same time at 0-0. Britain and partner Dan Cook felt that it wasn’t in the VAR convention to stop the game by and by after it’d restarted and subsequently the on-field authorities didn’t know about their mistake until the span.

Liverpool have proactively reached the PGMOL requesting to approach the sound of Hooper and Britain’s discussion, however Reds legend Jamie Carragher is as yet irate about the “horrible slip-up.” Carragher proclaimed on Monday Night Football: ” I don’t think the inclination about VAR has been lower, it’s at emergency point.

“It’s not only this choice it’s on the rear of different episodes this season, similar to the Wolves one with Manchester Joined together. I would rather not heap into the authorities or [PGMOL chief] Howard Webb, they should feel horrendous. I’m not into the paranoid fears – nobody acquires anything from this. We’ve every single committed error. In any case, this is an unpleasant misstep, phenomenal, you can’t exactly accept the clarification that has been given.”

Liverpool gave an assertion on Sunday night communicating their rage at the episode, notwithstanding the PGMOL recognizing that there was a “importance human blunder” in the span of an hour of full-time. ” We completely acknowledge the tensions that match authorities work under yet these tensions should be reduced, not exacerbated, by the presence and execution of VAR,” they said.

“It is accordingly inadmissible that adequate time was not stood to permit the right choice to be made and that there was no ensuing intercession. That such shortfalls have previously been sorted as “huge human mistake” is additionally unsatisfactory. All possible results ought to be laid out exclusively by the audit and with full straightforwardness.